BKG Analysis Report for rd2001 (20JAN15XA) This report is a contributed analysis report that does not correspond to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Dieter Ullrich, Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG), Spoolfile source: interactive nuSolve analysis.) Problems: HOBART26 - did not participate. . Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: The vgosDb BKG analysis output is available at ftp://ivs.bkg.bund.de/pub/vlbi/ivsdata/vgosdb_bkg/20JAN15XA.tgz This report includes the number of scheduled observations on the basis of Session Notes. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1703 scheduled 1124 correlated (included in database) 950 recoverable (usable in Solve/nuSolve) 933 used Session fit: 30.250 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA 364 239 236 64.8% HARTRAO 402 236 223 55.5% HOBART26 323 MISSED MISSED 0.0% KUNMING 573 297 288 50.3% NYALES20 578 260 257 44.5% ONSALA60 569 421 418 73.5% WETTZELL 597 447 444 74.4% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1703 950 933 54.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0016+731 78 55 48 61.5% 0119+115 7 7 6 85.7% 0137+012 18 12 12 66.7% 0211+171 25 13 10 40.0% 0241+622 74 54 13 17.6% 0256-005 20 20 8 40.0% 0308-611 21 7 7 33.3% 0312+100 38 35 35 92.1% 0316-444 12 4 0 0.0% 0410+110 73 59 47 64.4% 0458-020 33 32 32 97.0% 0522-611 27 7 7 25.9% 0528-250 37 16 16 43.2% 0537-441 14 4 4 28.6% 0642+449 49 37 29 59.2% 0716+714 33 28 27 81.8% 0748+126 57 37 34 59.6% 0823-223 45 31 10 22.2% 0955+476 96 67 59 61.5% 1046-409 13 4 3 23.1% 1057-797 28 9 8 28.6% 1104+728 48 41 37 77.1% 1125+366 54 42 33 61.1% 1143-332 12 4 0 0.0% 1144-379 10 4 4 40.0% 1215+303 69 39 37 53.6% 1251-197 12 7 4 33.3% 1330+476 74 53 48 64.9% 1333-152 17 9 5 29.4% 1333-337 20 7 2 10.0% 1349-439 27 11 7 25.9% 1417+385 124 92 86 69.4% 1424-418 9 5 5 55.6% 1705+018 88 61 61 69.3% 1758-651 14 3 3 21.4% 1806+456 66 52 47 71.2% 1908+484 15 5 1 6.7% 2029+024 57 36 35 61.4% 2145+082 43 27 23 53.5% 2155-304 46 27 24 52.2% 2214+350 15 15 15 100.0% 2254+024 12 8 8 66.7% 2314-409 17 5 4 23.5% 2329-415 19 8 6 31.6% 3C446 21 19 19 90.5% IIIZW2 16 6 4 25.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1703 1124 933 54.8% * Correlated means included in the database. ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA-HARTRAO 71 68 66 93.0% FORTLEZA-HOBART26 60 MISSED MISSED 0.0% FORTLEZA-KUNMING 24 13 13 54.2% FORTLEZA-NYALES20 53 22 22 41.5% FORTLEZA-ONSALA60 79 69 68 86.1% FORTLEZA-WETTZELL 77 67 67 87.0% HARTRAO-HOBART26 106 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HARTRAO-KUNMING 101 77 70 69.3% HARTRAO-NYALES20 34 14 12 35.3% HARTRAO-ONSALA60 34 25 25 73.5% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 56 52 50 89.3% HOBART26-KUNMING 114 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HOBART26-NYALES20 21 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HOBART26-ONSALA60 8 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HOBART26-WETTZELL 14 MISSED MISSED 0.0% KUNMING-NYALES20 125 59 58 46.4% KUNMING-ONSALA60 102 74 73 71.6% KUNMING-WETTZELL 107 74 74 69.2% NYALES20-ONSALA60 174 82 82 47.1% NYALES20-WETTZELL 171 83 83 48.5% ONSALA60-WETTZELL 172 171 170 98.8% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1703 950 933 54.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.