BKG Analysis Report for rd2004 (20MAY06XA) This report is a contributed analysis report that does not correspond to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Dieter Ullrich, Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (BKG), Spoolfile source: interactive nuSolve analysis.) Problems: KUNMING - did not participate. . Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: The vgosDb BKG analysis output is available at ftp://ivs.bkg.bund.de/pub/vlbi/ivsdata/vgosdb_bkg/20MAY06XA.tgz This report includes the number of scheduled observations on the basis of Session Notes. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1433 scheduled 956 correlated (included in database) 740 recoverable (usable in Solve/nuSolve) 724 used Session fit: 31.230 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA 318 210 206 64.8% HARTRAO 327 172 158 48.3% HOBART26 284 64 64 22.5% KUNMING 475 MISSED MISSED 0.0% NYALES20 454 285 281 61.9% ONSALA60 475 355 352 74.1% WETTZELL 533 394 387 72.6% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1433 740 724 50.5% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0059+581 69 56 53 76.8% 0131-522 13 13 12 92.3% 0137+012 31 14 10 32.3% 0211+171 40 18 10 25.0% 0241+622 70 51 14 20.0% 0312+100 39 20 14 35.9% 0316-444 12 4 1 8.3% 0322+222 13 9 8 61.5% 0410+110 58 39 23 39.7% 0522-611 35 35 18 51.4% 0528-250 32 18 10 31.2% 0716+714 39 28 26 66.7% 0823-223 65 41 8 12.3% 0854-108 11 10 7 63.6% 0955+476 60 49 48 80.0% 1046-409 7 2 1 14.3% 1104+728 59 37 37 62.7% 1125+366 58 35 25 43.1% 1143-332 12 4 4 33.3% 1144-379 7 5 4 57.1% 1149-084 35 27 27 77.1% 1215+303 70 49 42 60.0% 1251-197 23 11 6 26.1% 1330+476 68 56 48 70.6% 1333-152 16 6 0 0.0% 1333-337 21 8 1 4.8% 1349-439 19 14 11 57.9% 1519-273 9 7 7 77.8% 1639+230 32 28 22 68.8% 1741-038 29 23 23 79.3% 1758-651 3 3 0 0.0% 1908+484 16 5 3 18.8% 1923+210 13 7 7 53.8% 1936-155 10 10 10 100.0% 2029+024 32 20 14 43.8% 2059+034 29 15 15 51.7% 2145+082 35 19 11 31.4% 2155-304 18 7 6 33.3% 2254+024 13 4 1 7.7% 2314-409 10 3 0 0.0% 2318+049 39 32 29 74.4% 2319+317 17 17 16 94.1% 2329-415 17 9 9 52.9% 3C418 44 30 29 65.9% IIIZW2 28 12 9 32.1% OJ287 51 46 45 88.2% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1433 956 724 50.5% * Correlated means included in the database. ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA-HARTRAO 47 39 35 74.5% FORTLEZA-HOBART26 36 11 11 30.6% FORTLEZA-KUNMING 19 MISSED MISSED 0.0% FORTLEZA-NYALES20 47 25 25 53.2% FORTLEZA-ONSALA60 94 73 73 77.7% FORTLEZA-WETTZELL 75 62 62 82.7% HARTRAO-HOBART26 78 45 45 57.7% HARTRAO-KUNMING 84 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HARTRAO-NYALES20 28 18 16 57.1% HARTRAO-ONSALA60 30 18 16 53.3% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 60 52 46 76.7% HOBART26-KUNMING 120 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HOBART26-NYALES20 25 0 DESELECTED 0.0% HOBART26-ONSALA60 7 0 DESELECTED 0.0% HOBART26-WETTZELL 18 8 8 44.4% KUNMING-NYALES20 88 MISSED MISSED 0.0% KUNMING-ONSALA60 67 MISSED MISSED 0.0% KUNMING-WETTZELL 97 MISSED MISSED 0.0% NYALES20-ONSALA60 130 117 116 89.2% NYALES20-WETTZELL 136 125 124 91.2% ONSALA60-WETTZELL 147 147 147 100.0% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1433 740 724 50.5% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.